The fewer the facts, the stronger the opinion

The six new oil paintings for April’s launch most definitely continue the twin themes of conflict and resolution, and more so of “coexistence”. It was Arnold Glasow who said "the fewer the facts, the stronger the opinion" and elements in these paintings reflect something of that. They are a continued response to a difficult set of circumstances that I have personally encountered in the Middle East over the past eighteen years and the circumstances centred on Jerusalem can be seen as indicative of a wider conflict of ideologies, religions and geopolitical power struggles.

Recently I gave an artist’s talk to a group and there was one particular question afterwards that I though was perhaps both pertinent and astute. I was asked if the West, having failed to resolve the Middle East conflicts should have allowed (or should now allow) the Middle East to attempt to do so. I instantly recalled an essay recently read titled “The Map that Ruined the Middle East”. It laid responsibility of much of the current mess with the post WW1 European Powers (in particular Britain and France) who carved up the remnants of the failed Ottoman empire according to their own European Colonialist interests and priorities (using a ruler and straight lines on a map that paid no heed to the demographic or geographic reality on the ground over hundreds of miles!).

The essay goes on to state that the borders within Europe have been relatively stable (“relatively” being the operative word here) for a long time now having resolved them with a couple of centuries of fighting. Many European borders generally follow along both demographic and geographic lines, ie population identities and natural features in the land. The last centuries conflicts within Europe have not been so much about borders but more of an aggressive conquest of a neighbouring country or persecution of a minority within existing borders. Basically the essay said “squiggly borders work” as opposed to arbitrary straight lines.

So, should the West leave the Middle East to redraw the map probably through conflict, but hopefully resolving its own border issues in the process? As they no doubt still say in exam papers...“discuss”


.

from the “Reason or Revelation” exhibition visitors book…

“Great concepts, beautifully expressed”

“I am impressed and amazed…”

“Your sentiments are relevant today and for every day”

“Beautiful, thoughtful, genuine work”

“Stunning work from a very talented guy. You have really inspired me…"

"A true inspiration for peace”

    .

A Personal View

Interview with MALCOLM LINDSAY, COMPOSER

by Melanie Sims, writer and photographer

How did you and Stuart meet?

I met Stuart around thirty three years ago through a music festival in Dundee. It was a get together in a Dundee curry house that comes to mind. When he moved back to Glasgow from Aberdeen a couple of years later we got to know each other better though our mutual enthusiasm for music, art and inevitably curries.

What were your first impressions of his art?

I'd not known a 'real' artist until I met Stuart! As I got to know his work I was immediately struck by the depth and consistency of focus in his etchings which impressed me greatly. His art moved me. It was like discovering another world that I had not been aware of. It also opened my eyes to art in general and his work became a way by which I engaged with, and reviewed other work.

What are the elements in Stuart's work that resonate particularly with you?

Stuart's work connects with me in quite a powerful way. I think there is an honesty and directness that is rare. There is also a powerful depth of meaning in the art he produces. Stuart's strong beliefs and his stance on world issues are communicated in many subtle ways. They are revealed and developed further as you spend time with his art.  His technical strength also brings another dimension to the themes he explores – 

some of the minute details in his works are truly mind boggling! 

When did you begin to collaborate? What form did that collaboration take?

We collaborated musically in the late 1980’s when, along with Carol Moore, we formed 'The Moors'. Stuart was a fantastic bass player and writing and performing with him was a privilege and inspiration. In the years since we have continued to collaborate. An example is the collection of sounds that Stuart brought back from Jerusalem that I used to inspire and incorporate into a piece of music called Dreaming of Jerusalem. This in turn inspired a video piece using his photography from Israel. Stuart has presented this multimedia work as part of his artist’s talks in a number of places, including Jerusalem when he returned for a residency last year. 

So his work has influenced your music?

His approach to the creative process is inspirational. He tackles sometimes difficult issues, but always with grace and style, and the results are often breath taking. It has encouraged me not to shy away from challenging myself and to push boundaries.

What resonance does his work continue to have in your life and music?

Stuart has a great quality as a collaborator and his approach is to continue asking questions, seeking and exploring options long after most of us would have given up. His work and approach demonstrates a real zest for art, and life, and I've found that pushes me to strive just a little bit harder to achieve the best I can across my music and the collaborations I engage in.

Interview from the Reason or Revelation solo exhibition catalogue. 

Download the catalogue free.

.

Inheritance - a time bomb or a gift to share?

At which point in history does the conflict in the Middle East have its beginnings?    

We can go back centuries, millennia even as each successive civilization puts down its roots in the land, laying the foundations for claim and counterclaim for generations to come. As soon as we untangle one part there is another layer of tangle underneath. So how far do we go back?    

In the past I have always looked back to the dawn of recorded history in the Middle East but in fact I actually believe this question to be both unhelpful and inappropriate. Backwards is no way forwards. Over the centuries there has simply accumulated too much wrong and too much right on all sides to make any clear cut moral case for, or against any party being in the right or not. Too many "peoples" now have a cultural or ancestral claim on the land. If making a Divine claim on the land, lack of consideration for others can easily lead us into a "my god is bigger than your god" scenario, which then makes God into an agent of human endeavor.

So what is the way forward? There are two key words that govern my attitudes to, and actions within the Middle East whether at home in Scotland or in Jerusalem. Two words, "compassion" and "coexistence".    

To have compassion for someone is to show concern for putting someone else's well-being on a par with our own. It is a recognition that everyone has the right to basic human dignity and it challenges our willingness to offer it regardless of whether we perceive it as deserved or not.

Although we may have "rights" regarding certain issues, and we may be perfectly within our "rights" to exercise them, the compassionate response is to consider the well-being of others in the light of our "rights". Their well-being and our rights may actually be in conflict with each other. I have seen this in Glasgow and in Belfast where parading/marching through a particularly sensitive area of the city is "our right". But is it actually the right thing to do, if it’s provocative and antagonistic? Is it a compassionate response? Is it not one of arrogance that says “this is my right and you are going to have to live with its consequences”?

Which brings me to the second of my two key words. Coexistence. Recently, on a gable end wall in west Jerusalem I saw a work of graffiti art that said "just forgive". It’s easy to say but in reality much more difficult to do. Fundamentalists, whichever side they are on will have difficulty with this and they will see only the rightness of their own world-view, and in more extreme cases the wrongness of everyone else's. In reality the alternative to forgiveness does not even bear thinking about. It can only lead to bitterness, reprisal (tit for tat which adds yet more layers), suspicion, fear and inevitably to an escalation of conflict.

Although it may not be easy or even desirable to forget (lest we repeat our past mistakes), it is possible to forgive. Within a conflict, this can begin to happen when at least one of the sides realises it can, and must, let go of exclusive claims on mistreatment, persecution and suffering. Having the courage to recognise that others have suffered too, is the start of putting the well-being of such others on a level with our own. I have recently been encouraged whilst talking with people on both sides of this conflict and hearing an increasing number of ordinary Israelis and Palestinian/Israeli Arabs speak of one land for all people. Some even say they don’t care what it’s called, just so long as they can live here, at home, in peace and with dignity.           

Stuart Duffin, Jerusalem/Glasgow 2013